Is Growth Exogenous? Taking Mankiw, Romer and Weil Seriously
56 Pages Posted: 9 Jul 2001 Last revised: 11 Nov 2022
Date Written: July 2001
Abstract
Is long-run economic growth exogenous? To address this question, we show that the empirical framework of Mankiw, Romer, and Weil (1992) can be extended to test any growth model that admits a balanced growth path; and we use that framework both to revisit variants of the Solow growth model and to evaluate simple alternative models of endogenous growth. To allow for the possibility that economies in our sample are not on their balanced growth paths, we also study the cross-sectional behavior of TFP growth, which we estimate using alternative measures of labor's share. Our broad conclusion, based on both model estimation and growth accounting, is that long-run growth is significantly correlated with behavioral variables such as the savings rate, and that this correlation is not easily explained by models in which growth is treated as the exogenous variable. Hence, future empirical studies should focus on models that exhibit endogenous growth.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
It's Not Factor Accumulation: Stylized Facts and Growth Models
By William Easterly and Ross Levine
-
Capital Mobility in Neoclassical Models of Growth
By Robert J. Barro, N. Gregory Mankiw, ...
-
Relative Prices and Relative Prosperity
By Chang-tai Hsieh and Peter J. Klenow
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
The Marginal Product of Capital
By Francesco Caselli and James Feyrer
-
By Jonathan Eaton and Samuel S. Kortum
-
The Tyranny of Concepts: Cudie (Cumulated, Depreciated Investment Effort) is Not Capital