The Deafening Silence of the 'Comfort Women': A Response Based on Lyotard and Irigaray
(2015) 2 (2) Asian Journal of Law and Society 339-356
Posted: 13 Apr 2016 Last revised: 20 Dec 2017
Date Written: April 12, 2015
Abstract
This article reflects upon the continuing historical denialism concerning the Korean “comfort women” forced into sexual slavery by the Japanese military during World War II. We argue that the refusal of the Japanese government and others to squarely confront this wrong is made possible through the exploitation of a différend in Jean-François Lyotard’s sense of the term. The différend arises from a complex set of social, cultural, and legal sources, including patriarchal, colonial, and nationalistic constructions of the wrong and its victims. We seek to tentatively expose the nature of the différend by identifying these factors. We then sketch the beginnings of a possible response, drawing on Luce Irigaray’s strategy of emphasizing sexual difference and separation to pave the way for reciprocality between the sexes. The testimonies of the “comfort women” must be allowed to speak for themselves before a response can emerge based in other discourses.
Keywords: Comfort women, Silencing, Denialism, Jean-Francois Lyotard, Luce Irigaray
JEL Classification: K00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation