Do Non-GAAP Earnings Influence Managers’ Real Activities and Accounting Choices?

58 Pages Posted: 21 Apr 2016 Last revised: 17 Nov 2017

Henry Laurion

University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business

Date Written: November 13, 2017

Abstract

It is now common for managers to emphasize non-GAAP earnings metrics that exclude certain expenses, such as acquisition and restructuring expenses, intangible asset amortization, asset write-downs, and stock compensation expense. This study hypothesizes that managers become focused on non-GAAP earnings, causing them to underweight excluded expenses when making investment and accounting decisions. Consistent with the underweighting of acquisition-related expenses, firms with a history of reporting non-GAAP earnings over-invest relative to their peers, and engage in more acquisitions. With respect to accounting choices, excluded expenses such as write-downs and stock option expense are recorded and measured more conservatively when excluded from non-GAAP earnings. The evidence suggests that the use of non-GAAP earnings can influence real activities and accounting choices.

Keywords: Non-GAAP Earnings; Abnormal Investment; Acquisitions; Layoffs; Write-downs; Stock Option Expense; SFAS 141(R); SFAS 123(R)

JEL Classification: M20; M40; M41

Suggested Citation

Laurion, Henry, Do Non-GAAP Earnings Influence Managers’ Real Activities and Accounting Choices? (November 13, 2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2764490 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2764490

Henry Laurion (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business ( email )

545 Student Services Building, #1900
2220 Piedmont Avenue
Berkeley, CA 94720
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
194
rank
142,290
Abstract Views
519
PlumX