A European Nevada? Bad Enforcement as an Edge in State Competition for Incorporations

41 Pages Posted: 18 Apr 2016 Last revised: 17 Jul 2017

Date Written: April 11, 2016


Though now possible, no European state is competing for incorporations, and this is unlikely to happen in a general fashion. In this paper I argue, however, that the possibility of one state competing for one specific segment of the market for incorporations should not be ruled out altogether. As has happened with Nevada in the US, a state could seek to attract companies that are looking for a very protective legal environment for their directors, officers and shareholders or for the company itself. Given the importance of enforcement, I argue that states could compete by capitalising on the inefficiency of their courts, rather than by changing the law on the books. The fact that no investment is necessary would change the perspective on incentives for states to compete: a very small incentive is needed if the costs are negligible. I also consider the possible drawbacks of such competition and the possible reactions from other states.

Keywords: Corporate Law, European Union, State competition, Regulatory competition, Delaware, Nevada, Harmonization, Race to the bottom

JEL Classification: G30, G32, G34, K20, K22, K41, K42, D72

Suggested Citation

Zorzi, Andrea, A European Nevada? Bad Enforcement as an Edge in State Competition for Incorporations (April 11, 2016). University Ca' Foscari of Venice, Dept. of Economics Research Paper Series No. 12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766174 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2766174

Andrea Zorzi (Contact Author)

University of Florence ( email )

Via delle Pandette, 9
Florence, 50127

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics