The Tax Paradox of Capital Investment

22 Pages Posted: 23 Apr 2016

Date Written: January 18, 2015


The historical economic data imply a significant “tax paradox”: Higher-tax nations tend to experience relatively higher rates of economic growth over time. Neoclassical economic theory implies, to the contrary, that lower-tax nations ought to grow faster than high-tax nations since capital is mobile. However, because new capital investment is generally tax deductible, marginal capital investment often favors active (i.e., high-growth) investment for tax deductibility reasons, resulting in a preference for incremental capital investment in higher tax nations. ”Tax practitioner” economics is not always consistent with neoclassical economic theory. In this article, the author explains why corruption is disproportionately harmful to economic growth (in short, corruption directly undermines the incentive for re-investment of capital, killing active capital investment via immediate taxation of profits); explains from a tax practitioner perspective why the Tax Reform Act of 1986 caused a reversal of the “lock-in effect,” resulting in a short-term economic boost; and posits that levying taxes on labor to try to attract “mobile” capital has the paradoxical effect of a potential reduction in mobile capital investment in a given economy.

Suggested Citation

Bogenschneider, Bret, The Tax Paradox of Capital Investment (January 18, 2015). 33:1 Journal Taxation of Investments 59 (2015).. Available at SSRN:

Bret Bogenschneider (Contact Author)

University of Surrey - School of Law ( email )

United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library


Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics