Party Finance Law in Australia: Innovation and Enervation

G Orr, 'Party Finance Law in Australia: Innovation and Enervation' (2015) 15 (1) Election Law Journal 13pp

Posted: 19 Apr 2016

See all articles by Graeme D. Orr

Graeme D. Orr

The University of Queensland - T.C. Beirne School of Law

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

The drivers (and inhibitors) of political finance reform are complex and overlapping. The case of Australia is an intriguing one. By international standards, regulation of political finance at the national level in Australia is laissez-faire and inertial. Since 2010 however, half the states and territories have adopted holistic party finance systems designed to limit the influence of money in electoral politics. These reforms have included caps on expenditure and donations, generous public funding and tighter donation disclosure. This article explores both the emerging constitutional constraints on — and political drivers of — this flourishing of reform. Whilst there is evidence of party machines seeking security in enhanced public funding, there is limited evidence to support the cartel thesis. Overall these developments highlight the potential for experimentation and cross-fertilization in a federal system, suggesting that reform is episodic but infectious, rather than a manifestation of any inexorable forces.

JEL Classification: K00

Suggested Citation

Orr, Graeme, Party Finance Law in Australia: Innovation and Enervation (2015). G Orr, 'Party Finance Law in Australia: Innovation and Enervation' (2015) 15 (1) Election Law Journal 13pp , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766794

Graeme Orr (Contact Author)

The University of Queensland - T.C. Beirne School of Law ( email )

The University of Queensland
St Lucia
4072 Brisbane, Queensland 4072
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
229
PlumX Metrics