Abstract

https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766823
 


 



Convulsive Flurry: Conspiracy, Consensus, Motivation: A Corollary to Lewandowsky et al (2015)


Michelle Stirling


Independent

April 4, 2016


Abstract:     
Conspiratorial ideation implicated in rejecting scientific propositions has been well-documented by Lewandowsky et al. (2012, 2013, 2014, 2015). As a corollary, this paper is a qualitative, observational review of the word themes in a ‘convulsive flurry’ of some 215 anonymized emails about climate science billboards that featured scientific statements. The results reveal conspiratorial ideation and cult-like rejection of new scientific information by supporters of the hypothesis of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW). Some 24% of word themes express conspiratorial views, 19% dismiss the statements outright as lies or misinformation, while 17% express aggression and dogmatic opposition to relevant climate science information. Unanticipated changes in climate or climate science theory may challenge the public and policy-makers.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: rejection of science, climate change, climate denial, conspiracy ideation, Lewandowsky, advertising, freedom of speech, fascism, dogma, conspiracist discourse


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: April 20, 2016  

Suggested Citation

Stirling, Michelle, Convulsive Flurry: Conspiracy, Consensus, Motivation: A Corollary to Lewandowsky et al (2015) (April 4, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2766823

Contact Information

Michelle Stirling (Contact Author)
Independent ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,607
Downloads: 167
Download Rank: 141,481
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper