Alternative Litigation Funding and the Italian Perspective

European Review of Private Law 2-2016 [253–270]

Posted: 27 Apr 2016 Last revised: 20 Sep 2016

See all articles by Gian Marco Solas

Gian Marco Solas

Maastricht University - Faculty of Law; Universita di Cagliari - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 24, 2016

Abstract

Alternative Litigation Funding (ALF) refers to any practice whereby an entity not party to a dispute provides capital to claimants or defendants or in any way bears whole or part of the dispute costs, in exchange for a share of the expected financial recovery. For a few years, the use of ALF has experienced some success in certain common law jurisdictions but has not yet emerged in most (European Union) civil law countries. Italy is one of those countries in which ALF has not yet emerged, although court costs have steadily increased in recent years, and practitioners’ claims for access to justice have multiplied. Against this background, after a comparative overview, this article aims to shed light on the current status and issues related to ALF in Italy. In doing so, some Italian legislation that might potentially involve this manner of funding will also be analysed, particularly with regard to the recent reforms of (civil and commercial) justice.

Keywords: Alternative litigation funding; Third party litigation funding

Suggested Citation

Solas, Gian Marco, Alternative Litigation Funding and the Italian Perspective (April 24, 2016). European Review of Private Law 2-2016 [253–270], Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2769568

Gian Marco Solas (Contact Author)

Maastricht University - Faculty of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 616
Maastricht, 6200
Netherlands

Universita di Cagliari - Faculty of Law ( email )

Cagliari
Italy

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
426
PlumX Metrics