Tools of Reason: Truncation Through Judicial Experience and Economic Learning

Antitrust, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 46-51, 2014

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 16-18

7 Pages Posted: 26 Apr 2016 Last revised: 29 Apr 2016

See all articles by Timothy J. Muris

Timothy J. Muris

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School

Brady Cummins

Latham & Watkins

Date Written: 2014

Abstract

In 1979, the Supreme Court began departing from strict rule of reason/per se categorization and by 1999 the Court made clear that the rule of reason was a continuum. With the Court providing little guidance on the details of the conduct for which truncated analysis is warranted, the FTC has attempted to fill this gap, focusing not on questions of market power but on the restraint itself. The Commission provided a basic structure for truncated analysis in 1988 Massachusetts Board, later modified in 2003 in Polygram. More recently, the federal antitrust agencies have sought to expand the class of conduct for which truncated analysis should apply in recent enforcement actions by the FTC involving real estate brokers and by the DOJ involving agreements between Silicon Valley tech companies not to cold-call each other’s employees. We argue that the agencies’ approach in these cases is not grounded on a reasoned analytical framework but instead relies on flawed reasoning through analogy. Truncation remains an important tool, both to promote efficient antitrust enforcement against those few restraints that can be condemned based on prior judicial experience and current economic learning without detailed and expensive consideration of market issues and to prohibit restraints that are shown through unambiguous direct evidence to cause substantial anticompetitive effects. Full consideration of the benefits and costs of challenged conduct remains the antitrust norm, and the government’s recent attempts to expand the scope of truncated analysis through reasoning by analogy should be dismissed as aberrations that do not warrant judicial recognition.

Keywords: Agency, analysis, antitrust, anticompetitive, economic, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, judicial, merger, no-call, polygram, restraint

JEL Classification: K21, K23

Suggested Citation

Muris, Timothy J. and Cummins, Brady, Tools of Reason: Truncation Through Judicial Experience and Economic Learning (2014). Antitrust, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 46-51, 2014; George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 16-18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2769921

Timothy J. Muris (Contact Author)

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-9421 (Phone)
703-993-8088 (Fax)

Brady Cummins

Latham & Watkins ( email )

United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
612
rank
376,704
PlumX Metrics