Impact Transaction: Lawyering for the Public Good Through Collective Impact Agreements

56 Pages Posted: 30 Apr 2016 Last revised: 9 Jun 2016

See all articles by Patience A. Crowder

Patience A. Crowder

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: April 28, 2016

Abstract

This Article outlines what the author proposes as the next step in the evolution of transactional law and practice: impact transaction is the strategic use of agreements between cross-sector parties as a mechanism to achieve broad social change. Connecting the nascent collective impact framework for social change with relational contract theory to develop frameworks for memorializing collective impact agreements and drafting relational contracts lays the groundwork for impact transaction strategy. Since the Supreme Court’s 1954 decision in Brown v. Board of Education, impact litigation has become the default strategy for initiating social change in the United States; the 2015 term’s gay marriage decision in Obergefell v. Hodges is but the most recent example. In a world of rising litigation costs and clogged judicial dockets, however, transactional advocacy in the public interest can play an equally critical role in advancing equity and equality.

Suggested Citation

Crowder, Patience A., Impact Transaction: Lawyering for the Public Good Through Collective Impact Agreements (April 28, 2016). Indiana Law Review, Vol. 49, p. 621, 2016; U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16-22. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2772124

Patience A. Crowder (Contact Author)

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80208
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
89
Abstract Views
541
rank
284,127
PlumX Metrics