38 Pages Posted: 4 May 2016
Date Written: May 2, 2016
This paper examines the relationship between household income shocks and fertility decisions. Using panel data from Tanzania, we estimate the impact of agricultural shocks on pregnancy, births, and contraception use. We estimate individual level fixed effect models to account for potential correlation between unobservable household characteristics and both shocks and decisions on fertility and contraceptive use. The likelihood of pregnancies and childbirth are significantly lower for households that experience a crop shock. Furthermore, women significantly increase their contraception use in response to crop losses. We find little evidence that the response to crop loss depends on education or wealth levels. The increase in contraceptive use comes almost entirely from traditional contraceptive methods, such as abstinence, withdrawal, and the rhythm method. We argue that these changes in behavior are the result of deliberate decisions of the households rather than the shocks’ effects on other factors that influence fertility, such as women’s health status, the absence or migration of a spouse, the dissolution of partnerships, or the number of hours worked. We also show that, although traditional contraceptives have low overall efficacy, households with a strong incentive to postpone fertility are very effective at using them.
Keywords: Tanzania, family planning, shocks, timing of fertility
JEL Classification: J1, 01, J2
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Alam, Shamma Adeeb and Pörtner, Claus C., Income Shocks, Contraceptive Use, and Timing of Fertility (May 2, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2773677