36 Pages Posted: 5 May 2016
Date Written: April 13, 2016
We study what makes a research grant application successful in terms of ability, type of research, experience, and demographics of the applicants. But our main objective is to investigate whether public funding organizations support the teams that are most likely to undertake transformative or “radical” research. Making use of the literature on recombinant innovation, we characterize such “radical teams” as those formed by eclectic and non-usual collaborators, and those that are heterogeneous and scientifically diverse. Our results, using data from the UK’s Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), show that the more able, more basic, and more senior researchers, working in a top university, are more likely to be successful. But, radical teams are less likely to be funded by funding bodies. Our analysis of the research output of the awarded projects suggests that, voluntarily or involuntarily, the evaluation process in these organizations is biased against radical teams.
Keywords: radical innovation, funding organizations, research grants
JEL Classification: O320, I230
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Banal-Estañol, Albert and Macho-Stadler, Ines and Pérez Castrillo, David, Key Success Drivers in Public Research Grants: Funding the Seeds of Radical Innovation in Academia? (April 13, 2016). CESifo Working Paper Series No. 5852. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2774648