The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 211: Unfulfilled Expectations and the Future of Modern Standardized Consumer Contracts

7 William & Mary Business Law Review 733 (2016)

Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2016-14

65 Pages Posted: 7 May 2016 Last revised: 10 Jun 2016

See all articles by Eric A. Zacks

Eric A. Zacks

Wayne State University Law School

Date Written: May 5, 2016

Abstract

By any measure, section 211 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts is a disappointment. The section purported to ensure the benefits of standardized contracts by presuming assent to all terms when a contract is signed or adopted. At the same time, section 211 made it unreasonable for drafting parties to rely on terms if the drafter knew or should have known that the other party would not have assented had the other been aware of such terms. Nevertheless, section 211 is rarely cited with respect to any standardized contract dispute, and even where cited, it rarely provides relief to the non-drafting party. Judges’ unwillingness to embrace section 211 is particularly pronounced and problematic in the online contracting context for consumers. This Article explains that section 211’s disuse can be attributed in part to its doctrinal formulation, which erects difficult barriers for non-drafting parties seeking relief. Perhaps more importantly, judges historically have been reluctant to disturb standardized consumer contracts, regardless of the applicable doctrine. Accordingly, it is useful to frame the problem of modern standardized consumer contracts in terms of how social and judicial conceptions of assent interact with doctrine and what forces can influence those conceptions. Judicial attitudes, for example, could be influenced by empirical evidence that examines consumer perceptions of modern standardized contract formation and the terms of such contracts. When confronted and internalized by judges and regulators who seek to determine appropriate relief, that kind of evidence can generate meaningful relief and meaningful reform.

Keywords: Restatement (Second) of Contracts 211, blanket assent, reasonable expectations, unfair surprise, standard form contracts, consumer contracts, mutual assent

Suggested Citation

Zacks, Eric A., The Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 211: Unfulfilled Expectations and the Future of Modern Standardized Consumer Contracts (May 5, 2016). 7 William & Mary Business Law Review 733 (2016), Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2016-14, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2776182

Eric A. Zacks (Contact Author)

Wayne State University Law School ( email )

471 West Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://law.wayne.edu/profile/en7490

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
2,118
Rank
429,626
PlumX Metrics