Insurance Acquisition Costs: Capitalizing Versus Expensing

Posted: 16 May 2016

See all articles by Chi-Chun Liu

Chi-Chun Liu

National Chengchi University

Yi-Ping Liao

Fu-Jen Catholic University

Date Written: May 16, 2016

Abstract

This paper examines whether the capitalization-amortization or the direct expensing method for insurance acquisition costs and commissions better reflects the economic substance. We find that both the currently capitalized-amortized acquisition costs and the as-if asset balance of expensed commissions are positively associated with equity market values, and are closely related to the level and volatility of subsequent insurance premiums. Results also show that when explaining the equity market value, the insurance commission is significantly negative if capitalized and amortized, but is insignificant if directly expensed. We are the first to examine how the insurance acquisition costs and commissions are related to subsequent economic benefits, and our results suggest that the partial deferral of insurance commissions does not faithfully reflect economic substance. The findings are also consistent with the IASB’s exposure draft of IFRS 4, under which the acquisition costs and commissions shall not be immediately expensed.

Keywords: insurance acquisition cost, commission, IFRS 4, value relevance

JEL Classification: M40, M41, G22

Suggested Citation

Liu, Chi-Chun and Liao, Yi-Ping, Insurance Acquisition Costs: Capitalizing Versus Expensing (May 16, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780282

Chi-Chun Liu

National Chengchi University

No. 64, Chih-Nan Road
Section 2
Wenshan, Taipei 11623
Taiwan

Yi-Ping Liao (Contact Author)

Fu-Jen Catholic University ( email )

510, Zhong Zheng Rd, XinZhuang District
New Taipei City, 24205
Taiwan

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,206
PlumX Metrics