11 Pages Posted: 17 May 2016
Date Written: May 2, 2016
The IV v. Bolivia case examines the rights of a Bolivian migrant woman who was given a tubal ligation (sterilized) without her informed consent. In this amicus curiae, Ciara O'Connell (University of Sussex) and Diana Guarnizo-Peralta and Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito (Dejusticia) intervene in order to explain how the medical field frequently becomes a place where discrimination is exercised against women in the form of gender stereotyping and "paternalistic control." This amicus requests that the Inter-American Court issue reparation provisions in order to guarantee non-repetition of these women's reproductive rights violations. The suggested reparations consist of the adoption of education programs aimed at training medical students and medical professionals, as well as the general population, and reform of internal rules and manuals on informed consent so that they comply with international standards.
Keywords: Reproductive Rights, Reparations, Gender, Human Rights, Inter-American System of Human Rights
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
O'Connell, Ciara and Guarnizo Peralta, Diana and Rodriguez-Garavito, Cesar, Amicus Curiae Brief Presented to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in the Case of IV v. Bolivia (May 2, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780631 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780631