Selection Bias or Treatment Effect? A Re-Examination of Russell 1000/2000 Index Reconstitution

55 Pages Posted: 17 May 2016 Last revised: 23 Oct 2019

See all articles by Wei Wei

Wei Wei

University of Oklahoma

Alex Young

Hofstra University - Frank G. Zarb School of Business

Date Written: October 21, 2019

Abstract

A recent literature uses the annual reconstitution of the Russell 1000 and 2000 Indexes as a source of seemingly exogenous variation in institutional ownership to study the effect of institutional ownership on firm outcomes. We show that lagged institutional ownership measured prior to reconstitution exhibits very similar pre-existing differences at the 1000/2000 cutoff, and thus the results from the most common implementation of this setting reflect selection bias instead of a treatment effect. Additional tests confirm that it is the use of rankings based on Russell's June index weights that leads to biased results. With an unbiased approach, there is no significant discontinuity in institutional ownership at the 1000/2000 cutoff despite the large difference in index weights.

Keywords: institutional ownership, regression discontinuity, Russell indexes, selection bias

JEL Classification: C36, G23, G30

Suggested Citation

Wei, Wei and Young, Alex, Selection Bias or Treatment Effect? A Re-Examination of Russell 1000/2000 Index Reconstitution (October 21, 2019). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2780660 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780660

Wei Wei

University of Oklahoma ( email )

Norman, OK 73019
United States
(405) 325-2712 (Phone)

Alex Young (Contact Author)

Hofstra University - Frank G. Zarb School of Business ( email )

Hempstead, NY 11549
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
744
Abstract Views
4,352
rank
36,393
PlumX Metrics