33 Pages Posted: 26 May 2016
Date Written: June 2016
In his new book, The Force of Law, Frederick Schauer maintains that law has no necessary properties (a position he calls legal anti‐essentialism), and that therefore jurisprudents should not assume that an inquiry into the nature of law has to be a search for such properties. I argue, however, that Schauer's attempt to show that legal anti‐essentialism is a defensible position fails, because his one main argument (the cognitive science argument) is either irrelevant or else incomplete, depending on how one understands it, and because the other main argument (the family resemblance argument) is false.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
This is a Wiley-Blackwell Publishing paper. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing charges $42.00 .
File name: RAJU.pdf
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.