Controlling Precident: Congressional Regulation of Judicial Decisionmaking

50 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2001

See all articles by Gary Lawson

Gary Lawson

Boston University School of Law

Abstract

Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen has recently urged enactment of a congressional statute that would limit the judicial use of precedent in constitutional cases. Although I share Professor Paulsen's general views on precedent, his proposed statute is unconstitutional. Congress does not have power to regulate by statute the decisionmaking processes of federal courts, even when those decisionmaking processes are themselves unconstitutional. Congress' sole remedy is impeachment and removal of judges who improperly decide cases. This assessment of congressional power calls into question many familiar practices, such as statutes regulating scope of review, statutes prescribing rules of evidence for courts, and statutes regulating judicial remedies.

Suggested Citation

Lawson, Gary, Controlling Precident: Congressional Regulation of Judicial Decisionmaking. Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 01-8. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=278410 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.278410

Gary Lawson (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-3812 (Phone)

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
178
Abstract Views
1,451
rank
177,280
PlumX Metrics