Zoning Away First Amendment Rights

53 WASH. U.J. of URB. & CONTEMP. L. 1, 1998

Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18

112 Pages Posted: 27 May 2016

Date Written: 1998

Abstract

To facilitate the tapering of local government regulation, this Article proposes that, as a matter of constitutional policy, the courts' should analyze zoning as a prior restraint when the challenged regulation has the potential to impact First Amendment rights. Zoning actions invalidated by the Court as prior restraints can then be adjudicated as common law nuisance actions that address those actual harms caused by the alleged offending land use activities. Admittedly, this proposal turns current constitutional jurisprudence "on its head." However, if courts can use "secondary effects" to give less protection to "lower-level" forms of expression, such as adult uses and commercial visual blight, then why shouldn't courts use the doctrine of prior restraint to give an extra level of protection to "higher-level" First Amendment rights, such as religious exercise?

Keywords: Zoning, First Amendment, Prior Restraint, Freedom of Speech, Free Exercise, Religious Exercise, Freedom of Association, Associational Rights, Adult Use Regulation, Public Nuisance, Private Nuisance, Indecency Statutes, Commercial Speech, Billboards, Public Solicitation, Public Demonstrations, Publi

Suggested Citation

Saxer, Shelley Ross, Zoning Away First Amendment Rights (1998). 53 WASH. U.J. of URB. & CONTEMP. L. 1, 1998; Pepperdine University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2784906

Shelley Ross Saxer (Contact Author)

Pepperdine University School of Law ( email )

24255 Pacific Coast Highway
Malibu, CA 90263
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
426
PlumX Metrics