Socially Responsible Investing: Data-Driven Decision Making

12 Pages Posted: 29 May 2016

See all articles by Magali A. Delmas

Magali A. Delmas

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Jinghui Lim

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Date Written: May 26, 2016

Abstract

Socially responsible investing (SRI) is an investment process that screens investment opportunities based on ethical, social, corporate governance, or environmental. SRI has been growing rapidly; total U.S.-domiciled SRI-managed assets increased from $3.74 trillion in 2012 to $6.57 trillion in 2014. The growth of SRI puts it in a position to encourage sustainability as such firms have better access to capital markets. Unfortunately, while financial performance indicators have become standardized, social and environmental performance ratings have not. As the prominence of SRI grows, so does the number of metrics available to evaluate corporate social performance: there were 21 ratings in 2000 and that number grew to 108 by 2012.

The complexity of environmental and social performance contributes to the proliferation of rating metrics. Different aspects of environmental performance might be important to different rating schemes. For instance, one rating could place emphasis on greenhouse gas emissions, while another rating could focus on water usage. The heterogeneity of such ratings creates a situation in which the results of an assessment of environmental performance can differ based on which criteria are used. This case examines this phenomenon.

This case study examines 13 publicly traded chemical companies in order to understand the various measures and dimensions of corporate environmental performance. Students are presented with real-world data on corporate environmental performance (including pollutants released and third-party corporate social responsibility ratings) and asked to incorporate environmental and social performance into investing decisions. This case highlights some of the challenges of evaluating corporate environmental performance. This includes the positive correlation between environmental strengths and concerns. That is to say, firms that tend to have significant environmental issues, tend also to invest in sustainable practices. Thus looking only at environmental strengths might present a misleading picture of firm corporate environment performance. A companion teaching note is available upon request from the authors.

Keywords: Socially Responsible Investing, Environmental Performance, Social Performance, Corporate Social Responsibility, Corporate Disclosure

JEL Classification: D21,L21,M14, M2, M40, M41, M49

Suggested Citation

Delmas, Magali A. and Lim, Jinghui, Socially Responsible Investing: Data-Driven Decision Making (May 26, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2784965 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2784965

Magali A. Delmas (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Jinghui Lim

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
236
rank
125,026
Abstract Views
1,066
PlumX Metrics