The Hart-Fuller Debate

Gomez, J. V. (2014), The Hart-Fuller Debate. Philosophy Compass, 9: 45–53. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12096

12 Pages Posted: 28 May 2016

See all articles by Juan Vega Gomez

Juan Vega Gomez

National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) - UNAM, Legal Research Institute

Date Written: January 1, 2014

Abstract

I will center the discussion of the Hart-Fuller debate on the five claims Hart mentions might be understood as legal positivism main tenets: (1) the command theory; (2) the no necessary connection thesis; (3) the methodological claim; (4) the charge of positivism as formalism and the problem of interpretation; and (5) the meta-ethical confusion. In light of these five claims, I will explore whether the exchange of views between Hart and Fuller in 1957 truly amounted to a debate. Sorting out this issue is the aim of this article.

Suggested Citation

Vega Gomez, Juan, The Hart-Fuller Debate (January 1, 2014). Gomez, J. V. (2014), The Hart-Fuller Debate. Philosophy Compass, 9: 45–53. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12096, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2785640

Juan Vega Gomez (Contact Author)

National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) - UNAM, Legal Research Institute ( email )

Circuito Mario de la Cueva S/N
Zona Cultural, Ciudad Universitaria
Mexico City, 04510
Mexico

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
4,268
Abstract Views
15,251
Rank
4,440
PlumX Metrics