Protecting Competition vs. Protecting Competitors: Assessing the Antitrust Complaints Against Google

37 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2016

See all articles by Geeta Gouri

Geeta Gouri

Independent

Michael A. Salinger

Boston University - Questrom School of Business

Date Written: May 31, 2016

Abstract

We examine the merits of competition cases brought against Google with respect to alleged search bias. The four key steps in a structured investigation into an alleged abuse of dominance/monopolization/unfair method of competition are:

1) characterization of the conduct,

2) market definition,

3) assessment of market power, and

4) assessment of competitive effects.

Of these, the last step is the most important as it addresses the ultimate issue in the investigation. We analyse the fourth step and argue that the behaviour at issue is competitive. We then go through the first three steps and show that while economically sound analysis of those steps clarifies the proper answer to the fourth step, an overly mechanistic approach to those steps can obscure clear analysis in the fourth step.

Keywords: antitrust, abuse of dominance, Google

JEL Classification: K21, L40, L41, L86

Suggested Citation

Gouri, Geeta and Salinger, Michael A., Protecting Competition vs. Protecting Competitors: Assessing the Antitrust Complaints Against Google (May 31, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2787343 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2787343

Geeta Gouri

Independent ( email )

Michael A. Salinger (Contact Author)

Boston University - Questrom School of Business ( email )

595 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA MA 02215
United States
617-353-4408 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
501
Abstract Views
2,355
Rank
101,685
PlumX Metrics