Why Daimler Accommodates Personal Jurisdiction in Mass Tort Litigations

24 Pages Posted: 9 Jun 2016 Last revised: 13 Aug 2017

Date Written: June 7, 2016

Abstract

Unified administration of mass torts in centralized venues serves numerous functional, fairness, efficiency and consistency objectives. Requisite is the forum court’s exercise of personal jurisdiction over the parties. Recent Supreme Court opinions concerning personal jurisdiction, culminating in Daimler, have not yet addressed mass tort litigation. This article demonstrates that Daimler’s theoretical underpinnings are attentive to the "practical necessities" of the litigation at issue, and accommodate personal jurisdiction over multistate entities in mass tort litigations. This is because Daimler's narrowing of general personal jurisdiction contemplates the liberalized and context-sensitive exercise of specific personal jurisdiction.

Keywords: Daimler, Jurisdiction, Von Mehren, Specific Jurisdiction, Mass Torts

Suggested Citation

Golanski, Alani, Why Daimler Accommodates Personal Jurisdiction in Mass Tort Litigations (June 7, 2016). Albany Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 1, pp. 311-334 (2016/2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2791643 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2791643

Alani Golanski (Contact Author)

Weitz & Luxenberg, PC ( email )

New York, NY
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
139
rank
200,935
Abstract Views
811
PlumX Metrics