39 Pages Posted: 10 Jun 2016 Last revised: 11 Nov 2016
Date Written: November 10, 2016
Recently a range of alternative risk premia products have been developed promising investors hedge fund/CTA like returns with higher liquidity, transparency and relatively low fees. The attractiveness of these products rests on the assumption that they can deliver similar returns. Using a novel reporting bias free sample of 3,419 CTA funds as a testing ground, our results suggest this assumption is questionable. We find that CTAs are not a homogenous group. We identify eight different CTA sub-strategies, each with very different sources of return and low correlation between sub-strategies. To illustrate the difficulty of modelling the strategies we specify recently identified alternative risk premia from the academic literature as factors to examine the sources of return of CTAs. We find that these premia fail to explain between 56% and 86% of returns. Our results suggest that, given the heterogeneity of CTAs, while these new products may deliver on liquidity, transparency and fees, investors expecting hedge fund/CTA - like returns may be disappointed.
Keywords: Performance measurement, Commodity Trading Advisors, CTAs, Alternative risk premia
JEL Classification: G10, G19, G20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Foran, Jason and Hutchinson, Mark C. and McCarthy, David F and O'Brien, John J., Just a One Trick Pony? An Analysis of CTA Risk and Return (November 10, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2791960