Is Delaware's 'Other Major Political Party' Really Entitled to Half of Delaware's Judiciary?

43 Pages Posted: 19 Jun 2016 Last revised: 20 Jun 2016

Date Written: June 16, 2016

Abstract

Delaware has long been unique in its means of selecting judges. Before the Constitutional Convention of 1897, Delaware's governors possessed the unilateral power to appoint judges for life tenure. Ever since, Delaware has limited the number of judges registered with a single political party. A bipartisan bargain implemented in 1951 amended the Delaware Constitution in a manner that created the current system, by which every member of the Delaware Supreme Court, Court of Chancery, and Superior Court must belong to one of the two major political parties, with each party entitled to half of the judgeships.

Over the past several decades, the United States Supreme Court has developed a body of First Amendment case law bearing on political party affiliation. This article is the first to discuss the pertinence of First Amendment precedent to Delaware’s unique approach to judicial selection. I conclude that various lines of First Amendment cases cast great doubt on the constitutionality of categorically disqualifying Independents and members of minor parties from judgeships on Delaware's major commercial courts.

Suggested Citation

Friedlander, Joel Edan, Is Delaware's 'Other Major Political Party' Really Entitled to Half of Delaware's Judiciary? (June 16, 2016). Arizona Law Review, Issue 58, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2796417

Joel Edan Friedlander (Contact Author)

Friedlander & Gorris, P.A. ( email )

1201 N. Market Street, Suite 2200
Wilmington, DE 19801
United States
302-573-3502 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
54
rank
367,029
Abstract Views
247
PlumX Metrics