The Standard for Determining the Legality of Vertical Price Restraints

Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall 2010

Pace University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016/09

12 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2016

Date Written: 2010

Abstract

Section I of the Sherman Act condemns and declares illegal "every restraint, combination in form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States." Under the Sherman Act, agreements to fix prices between natural competitors, e.g., retailers or manufacturers, are illegal per se. So-called horizontal price-fixing agreements of this nature do not require analysis by courts to determine whether or not they damage competition because they have been declared illegal by their very nature, i.e., per se. Vertical price-fixing and vertical price restraints, e.g., agreements between manufacturers and distributors which set a minimum price at which a product can be sold, were similarly declared illegal per se in 1911 by the United States Supreme Court in the famous Dr. Miles case. Generally, most other agreements or actions which are not illegal per se but are alleged to be in violation of the Sherman Act are judged by what is known as the rule of reason. Basically, the rule of reason doctrine requires analysis of an alleged violation and the weighing of all circumstances and factors to determine whether a restriction on trade or competition unreasonably restrains competition. Those that do not unreasonably restrain competition are permitted. In 2007, ninety-six years after they established the Dr. Miles rule for vertical restraints, the Supreme Court considered again the question of how agreements between manufacturers and distributors setting minimum prices should be viewed, i.e., under the rule of reason or per se illegal. The following article analyzes the landmark decision.

Suggested Citation

Magaldi, Arthur M. and Le Vine, Saul S. and Magaldi, Jessica, The Standard for Determining the Legality of Vertical Price Restraints (2010). Journal of Business and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 22, No. 1, Fall 2010; Pace University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2016/09. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2798195

Arthur M. Magaldi

Pace University ( email )

One Pace Plaza
White Plains, NY New York 10603
United States

Saul S. Le Vine

Pace University ( email )

One Pace Plaza
White Plains, NY New York 10603
United States

Jessica Magaldi (Contact Author)

Pace University ( email )

One Pace Plaza
New York, NY New York 10038
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
27
Abstract Views
139
PlumX Metrics