Grutter and Gratz: A Critical Analysis

56 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2016

See all articles by Lackland Bloom

Lackland Bloom

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

This Article will analyze the Grutter and Gratz opinions, especially Justice O'Connor's important opinion for the majority in Grutter, and will consider the significance of these decisions in terms of university admissions policy, justifications for racial preferences, and equal protection doctrine. The article will conclude that the Court's defense of the use of racial preferences does not square well with the Powell opinion in Bakke on which it relied so heavily. It will suggest that the Court could have offered a more persuasive explanation for the result it reached but probably felt precluded by precedent from doing so.

Keywords: Grutter v. Bollinger, Gratz v. Bollinger, University of California v. Bakke, Supreme Court, race, civil rights, higher education, racial minorities, discrimination, racial preferences, diversity justification, equal protection

Suggested Citation

Bloom, Lackland, Grutter and Gratz: A Critical Analysis (2004). Houston Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2, 2004; SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 297. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2798285

Lackland Bloom (Contact Author)

Southern Methodist University - Dedman School of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 750116
Dallas, TX 75275
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
26
Abstract Views
307
PlumX Metrics