Toward a Context-Specific Chevron Deference

20 Pages Posted: 22 Jun 2016 Last revised: 24 Feb 2017

See all articles by Christopher J. Walker

Christopher J. Walker

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law

Date Written: June 21, 2016


With Justice Scalia’s passing, the Supreme Court is less likely to consider overturning the administrative law doctrines affording deference to agency statutory interpretations (Chevron deference) or agency regulatory interpretations (Auer deference). Without Justice Scalia on the Court, however, a different kind of narrowing becomes more likely. The Court may well embrace Chief Justice Roberts’s context-specific Chevron doctrine, as articulated in his dissent in City of Arlington v. FCC and his opinion for the Court in King v. Burwell. This Article, which is part of a symposium on the future of the administrative state, explores the Chief Justice’s more limited approach to Chevron deference and details how recent empirical studies of statutory and regulatory drafters may well provide some support for a context-specific Chevron doctrine. Although the wisdom of such a reform lies outside the Article’s scope, litigants and scholars should pay more attention to the Chief Justice’s dissent in City of Arlington, as it may well soon become the law of the land.

Keywords: administrative law, Chevron deference, King v. Burwell, FCC v. City of Arlington

Suggested Citation

Walker, Christopher Jay, Toward a Context-Specific Chevron Deference (June 21, 2016). Missouri Law Review, Vol. 81, pp. 1095-1114, 2016; Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 353. Available at SSRN: or

Christopher Jay Walker (Contact Author)

Ohio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law ( email )

55 West 12th Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210
United States
614-247-1898 (Phone)


Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics