Two Years After Alice v. CLS Bank
Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society, Vol. 98, p. 354, 2016
22 Pages Posted: 23 Jun 2016 Last revised: 12 Oct 2016
Date Written: June 20, 2016
Abstract
As of June 19, 2016, courts have examined 568 challenged patents brought under § 101 motions citing Alice, resulting in 190 valid patents and 378 patents invalidated with an average invalidation rate of 66.5%. Specifically, the Federal Circuit upheld 3 patents and invalidated 34 patents — an average invalidation rate of 91.9%. Also, courts have decided a total of 500 motions brought under § 101 citing Alice, resulting in 109 validation holdings and 391 invalidation holdings with an average invalidation rate of 78.2%. Specifically, the Federal Circuit has decided 26 motions, resulting in 2 validation holdings and 24 invalidation holdings with an average invalidation rate of 92.3%. The district courts have decided 251 motions, resulting in 84 validation holdings and 167 invalidation holdings with an average invalidation rate of 66.5%. The PTAB has decided 209 motions, resulting in 23 validation holdings and 186 invalidation holdings with an average invalidation rate of 89.7%.
The one-year review of Alice v. CLS Bank is available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2619388.
Keywords: Alice v. CLS Bank, empirical, data, 2-year, two-year, review, software patent, computer-implemented invention
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation