The Legality of an Arbitration Agreement in Favour of CAS Under German Civil and Competition Law - The Pechstein Ruling of the German Federal Tribunal (BGH) of 7 June 2016

15 Pages Posted: 29 Jun 2016

See all articles by Despina Mavromati

Despina Mavromati

SportLegis / Université de Lausanne

Date Written: June 24, 2016

Abstract

The German Federal Tribunal (BGH) issued its decision in the long-awaited Pechstein case on June 7, 2016 (“BGH Ruling”). The core issue at stake before the BGH was the validity of the arbitration agreement between Ms. Claudia Pechstein (the Athlete), a speed skater and five-time Olympic gold medallist, and the International Skating Union (ISU). The BGH overturned the decision of the Munich Court of Appeals (OLG München) and upheld the arbitration clause between the Athlete and ISU. The present note offers an account of the jurisdictional issues raised in the BGH Ruling under German law and discusses the legal dimensions and the repercussions of the decision for sports arbitration in Germany and at the international level.

Keywords: international arbitration; sports arbitration; Pechstein; arbitration agreement; genuine arbitral tribunal; competition law; EU competition law; Court of Arbitration for Sport; Arbitral institution; jurisdiction; New York Convention; recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards

Suggested Citation

Mavromati, Despina, The Legality of an Arbitration Agreement in Favour of CAS Under German Civil and Competition Law - The Pechstein Ruling of the German Federal Tribunal (BGH) of 7 June 2016 (June 24, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2800044 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2800044

Despina Mavromati (Contact Author)

SportLegis / Université de Lausanne ( email )

Lausanne, CH-1003
Switzerland

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
218
Abstract Views
798
rank
142,224
PlumX Metrics