Talmudic Arguments: The Use of Insults, Reprimands, Rebukes and Curses as Part of the Disputation Process

66 Pages Posted: 30 Jun 2016 Last revised: 17 Apr 2018

See all articles by Hershey H. Friedman

Hershey H. Friedman

City University of New York - Department of Business Management

Date Written: June 28, 2016

Abstract

In the Talmud, the colleague one argued with most in legal matters in the Talmud was known as “bar plugta”; this individual was typically one’s best friend. This was seen as the ideal study partnership since it involved constructive arguing; one might see it as form of adversarial collaboration. Unfortunately, arguing often results in insults being hurled and there is always the risk that an insult can be seen as harsh rather than playful or part of the disputation process. One example of an insult used fairly frequently is the term terada which either means scatterbrain or lunatic. “Vinegar son of wine” is an expression used to indicate that someone was inferior to his father. The following insult was said about Rabbah bar bar Chanah [bar means son]: “Every Abba is as stupid as a donkey; and every bar bar Chanah is a fool.” This paper examines and discusses many different insults, reprimand, rebukes and even curses used by the sages.

Keywords: Constructive arguing, Talmud, logic, adversarial collaboration, banter, creative thinking

JEL Classification: A22, A23, B30, B31, I2, J50, M12, M14, M54, Z00, Z10, Z12

Suggested Citation

Friedman, Hershey H., Talmudic Arguments: The Use of Insults, Reprimands, Rebukes and Curses as Part of the Disputation Process (June 28, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2801821 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2801821

Hershey H. Friedman (Contact Author)

City University of New York - Department of Business Management ( email )

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
105
Abstract Views
615
rank
265,761
PlumX Metrics