The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A Review of the Empirical Evidence

Research Evaluation, 27(3), 238–245

19 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2016 Last revised: 24 Jun 2020

See all articles by Matthias Weber

Matthias Weber

University of St. Gallen - School of Finance

Date Written: April 3, 2018

Abstract

Each time researchers jointly write an article, a decision must be made about the order in which the authors are listed. There are two main norms for doing so. The vast majority of scientific disciplines use a contribution-based norm, according to which authors who contributed the most are listed first. Very few disciplines, most notably economics, instead resort primarily to the norm of listing authors in alphabetical order. It has been argued that (1) this alphabetical norm gives an unfair advantage to researchers with last name initials early in the alphabet and that (2) researchers are aware of this ‘alphabetical discrimination’ and react strategically to it, for example by avoiding collaborations with multiple authors. This article reviews the empirical literature and finds convincing evidence that alphabetical discrimination exists and that researchers react to it.

Keywords: Alphabetical discrimination, lexicographic order, contribution-based order, scientific publishing

Suggested Citation

Weber, Matthias, The Effects of Listing Authors in Alphabetical Order: A Review of the Empirical Evidence (April 3, 2018). Research Evaluation, 27(3), 238–245, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2803164 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2803164

Matthias Weber (Contact Author)

University of St. Gallen - School of Finance ( email )

Unterer Graben 21
St.Gallen, CH-9000
Switzerland

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
760
Abstract Views
15,886
rank
36,221
PlumX Metrics