Can Shareholder Activism Improve Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards?

19 Pages Posted: 6 Jul 2016

See all articles by Carol A. Marquardt

Carol A. Marquardt

City University of New York (CUNY) – Baruch College

Christine I. Wiedman

University of Waterloo

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 2016

Abstract

Manuscript type. Empirical.

Research question/issue. We empirically examine the antecedents of shareholder activism related to increasing the gender diversity of corporate boards of directors and whether such activism is an effective mechanism for achieving this goal. Because campaigns for increased gender diversity may be driven by either economic efficiency or social legitimacy concerns, we condition our analysis on activists' motivations for achieving their objectives.

Research findings/insights. Based on a sample of US S&P 1500 firms over 1997–2011, we find that female board representation and board independence are negatively associated with the likelihood of being targeted by a shareholder proposal related to gender diversity. We further document that financially motivated activists are more likely to target firms with extremely low female board representation than are socially motivated activists. Targeted firms significantly increase their female board representation in the two‐year period following proposal initiation, relative to that of a matched sample of non‐targeted firms, with no significant differences observed across activist motivations.

Theoretical/academic implications. Our findings provide empirical support for the effectiveness of shareholder activism in shaping corporate governance. Our work also suggests that shareholder activists' underlying motivations are an important conditioning variable in governance research, with both agency theory and institutional theory providing insight into differing motivations.

Practitioner/policy implications. Our findings suggest that shareholder proposals are an effective mechanism for increasing board diversity, irrespective of activist motivations. However, we note that mean female board representation for both targeted and non‐targeted firms remains far below the level of representation sought by various activist groups. For policy‐makers, this suggests that legislative action may be necessary to achieve these corporate board diversity goals in the US.

Keywords: Corporate Governance, Shareholder Activism, Gender Diversity, Board Composition

Suggested Citation

Marquardt, Carol and Wiedman, Christine I., Can Shareholder Activism Improve Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards? (July 2016). Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp. 443-461, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2805228 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/corg.12170

Carol Marquardt (Contact Author)

City University of New York (CUNY) – Baruch College ( email )

One Bernard Baruch Way, Box B12-225
New York, NY 10010
United States
646-312-3241 (Phone)

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
0
Abstract Views
309
PlumX Metrics