Subrogation and Insolvency

Posted: 5 Oct 2001

See all articles by Alan Sykes

Alan Sykes

Stanford University - Law School

Abstract

When tort judgments exceed the assets of tortfeasors and the tort victim has first party insurance for a portion of the loss suffered, the question arises as to how the recovery from the tortfeasor should be divided between the tort victim on the one hand and the insurer via its rights of subrogation on the other. A common view among the courts and legal commentators is that the insured should be made whole before the insurer recovers any amounts through subrogation. This article employs simple models of optimal insurance contracts to challenge this view, and concludes that the opposite rule will often be optimal. Accordingly, there is little basis for judicial interference with freedom of contract when the insurance agreement provides that the insurer must be made whole before the insured receives any portion of the recovery. The analysis also provides some support for allowing the insurer to take first in subrogation as a default rule at common law.

Suggested Citation

Sykes, Alan, Subrogation and Insolvency. Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 30, No. 2, Part 1, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=280819

Alan Sykes (Contact Author)

Stanford University - Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,947
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information