Inadequate Environmental Governance: Failure to Protect Sensitive Environmental Resources in Mining

15 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2016

Date Written: July 14, 2016

Abstract

This paper deals with sensitive environmental resources that warrant preservation. Inadequate legal safeguards for preserving such resources stem from the lack of recognition offered to the scientific realities of the natural environment. As a result, the long run implications for welfare losses are significant. Two Australian case studies in mining are considered. The first concerns the extraction of mineral deposits that are embedded in near pristine groundwater resource systems. The damages inflicted on the groundwater resource system can lead to hydrologic changes resulting in water scarcity. The second concerns mining operations that have implications for ground water and oceanic resource systems. In both cases, one observes inadequate of binding laws alongside improper economic analyses that have neglected the recognition of basic scientific realities. The improper economic analyses include the over-statement of the benefits of mining.

Keywords: Science and Policy, Mining, Ecological Assets, Opportunity Cost, Resource Rent Tax

Suggested Citation

Thampapillai, Dodo Jesuthason, Inadequate Environmental Governance: Failure to Protect Sensitive Environmental Resources in Mining (July 14, 2016). Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. 16-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2810887 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2810887

Dodo Jesuthason Thampapillai (Contact Author)

Crawford School of Public Policy ( email )

ANU College of Asia and the Pacific
J.G. Crawford Building, #132, Lennox Crossing
Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200
Australia

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
69
Abstract Views
471
rank
354,118
PlumX Metrics