Supreme Court Repeaters

38 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2016 Last revised: 19 Oct 2016

See all articles by Jason Iuliano

Jason Iuliano

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Ya Sheng Lin

Yale Law School; King's College, University of Cambridge, Political Thought and Intellectual History; Princeton University, Department of Politics

Date Written: July 18, 2016

Abstract

A case that receives cert once is special. A case that receives cert twice is truly exceptional. This Article is the first to examine the phenomenon of “Supreme Court Repeaters.” Although Repeaters may seem like mere curiosities, they are actually a valuable part of the Supreme Court’s docket. Our analysis reveals that the Justices use Repeaters in three ways: (1) to set up important substantive questions that could not be addressed on the first pass; (2) to supervise lower courts; and (3) to address different substantive issues that arise at distinct points in litigation. In this Article, we investigate Supreme Court Repeaters from the last ninety years and present our findings.

Keywords: Supreme Court, certiorari

Suggested Citation

Iuliano, Jason and Lin, Ya Sheng and Lin, Ya Sheng, Supreme Court Repeaters (July 18, 2016). 70 Vanderbilt Law Review 1349 (2016), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2811285

Jason Iuliano (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Ya Sheng Lin

Yale Law School ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

King's College, University of Cambridge, Political Thought and Intellectual History ( email )

King's Parade
Cambridge, CB2 1ST
United Kingdom

Princeton University, Department of Politics ( email )

Princeton, NJ
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
161
Abstract Views
2,107
Rank
384,235
PlumX Metrics