Dogs of War or Jackals of Terror? Foreign Fighters and Mercenaries in International Law

NUS Law Working Paper No. 2016/007

International Community Law Review 18(5) (2016), pp. 389–399

13 Pages Posted: 28 Jul 2016 Last revised: 13 Dec 2016

Simon Chesterman

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: July 27, 2016

Abstract

The threat of “blowback” from foreign fighters, unaffiliated volunteers who join an insurgency in a distant land, has led states to explore a variety of normative mechanisms. Among these is the international legal regime applicable to mercenaries. This short article considers the evolution of mercenarism and the efforts to regulate it. Attempts to fit foreign fighters into that normative category are unlikely to succeed. In part this is due to the question of motivation, which is central to most definitions of mercenary and focuses on private gain. But it is also linked to the reasons for regulation in the first place: mercenaries are seen as threats in the states to which they travel, while foreign fighters are primarily deemed threats by the states to which they might return.

Keywords: mercenaries, foreign fighters, terrorism, international law, United Nations, Security Council

Suggested Citation

Chesterman, Simon, Dogs of War or Jackals of Terror? Foreign Fighters and Mercenaries in International Law (July 27, 2016). NUS Law Working Paper No. 2016/007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2814889 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2814889

Simon Chesterman (Contact Author)

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )

469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776
Singapore

HOME PAGE: www.SimonChesterman.com

Paper statistics

Downloads
165
Rank
150,552
Abstract Views
568