Taking Care: How Concerns About Prior Knowledge Affect the Financing of Novel Projects
27 Pages Posted: 3 Sep 2001
Date Written: October 22, 2003
Abstract
Agents may propose bad projects because they unwittingly rely on defective prior knowledge. Concern about these honest mistakes encourages principals to examine track records of the agents' use of the same prior knowledge. But, such track records cannot exist for novel projects (or routine projects proposed under novel circumstances). Therefore agents may fail to obtain outside financing. This argument helps explain why highly novel ventures that are initially self-financed can subsequently attract outside financing without any decrease in standard 'incentive' or moral hazard problems. It also provides new insights about the differences in the novelty and other attributes of projects financed by individual 'angel' investors, venture capital partnerships and large public companies.
Note: Previously titled "Taking Care: How Efforts to Control Oblivious Ignorance Affect Investment Decisions"
Keywords: Error control; Governance; Joint action; Organizational structure; Innovation
JEL Classification: G30, G31, L11, L20, M13, M40, M46, O31
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock Markets
By Ronald J. Gilson and Bernard S. Black
-
Money Chasing Deals?: The Impact of Fund Inflows on Private Equity Valuations
By Paul A. Gompers and Josh Lerner
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital
-
The Returns to Entrepreneurial Investment: A Private Equity Premium Puzzle?
-
Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence
By Thomas F. Hellmann and Manju Puri