The Effectiveness of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in Making International Commercial Cross-Border Litigation Easier - A Critical Analysis

50 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2016

See all articles by Bhumika Khatri

Bhumika Khatri

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to critically analyse the effectiveness of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in making international commercial cross-border litigation easier. Transnational litigation is so complicated that an international litigant feels like a trapped insect in a spider’s web. Now that there is a global Convention in this area, it would be useful to determine how successful the new instrument is in protecting and freeing the international litigants from the transnational litigation’s web of complexities. Interestingly, the Hague Convention mainly applies its rules to exclusive choice of court clauses or agreements only. This paper argues that the exclusive choice of court agreement feature of the Hague Convention will resolve the problem of parallel proceedings and make international litigation a bit more predictable, certain and cheaper. Apart from these benefits, it is not likely to make an international litigant’s life easier in any significant manner. It is argued that the Hague Convention’s success is impeded by its narrow scope of applicability to exclusive choice of court agreements only, a wide variety of exclusions from the scope of the Convention, a lack of provision for parties with no choice of court agreements, a convoluted declarations system, a lack of protection for small and medium-sized enterprises entering into standard form contracts online as business-consumers, inadequate provision for issues arising out of judicial corruption and no provision for civil procedure rules. The paper ends with a few recommendations, which if adopted, would enhance the effectiveness of the Hague Convention considerably. It concludes that international litigation, being the default dispute resolution mechanism, needs to be worked upon and improved, possibly through a broader and better global Convention.

Keywords: International commercial contracts, international commercial cross-border litigation, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, exclusive choice of court agreements

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Khatri, Bhumika, The Effectiveness of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements in Making International Commercial Cross-Border Litigation Easier - A Critical Analysis (2016). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper No. 48/2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2817597

Bhumika Khatri (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, Victoria 6140
New Zealand

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
110
Abstract Views
571
rank
295,297
PlumX Metrics