Jaclyn L Neo (ed), Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Theory and Practice (Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge) (ISBN 978-1-138-91448-3), Chapter 6, pp. 139-158, 2016
Posted: 10 Aug 2016 Last revised: 20 Oct 2016
Date Written: July 1, 2016
Singapore courts apply a “strong presumption of constitutional validity” when considering if legislative or executive actions infringe the Constitution. They have also stated that the related doctrine of omnia praesumuntur rite esse acta – all things are presumed to have been done rightly – should be applied to the acts of persons holding high constitutional office such as the President, the Attorney-General, Cabinet members and judges. The presumption of constitutionality casts a heavy onus on an applicant for judicial review to make arguments or adduce evidence sufficient to require the government to justify the constitutionality of the action. This chapter traces the origin of the presumption and examines whether its application in constitutional cases is justified.
Keywords: constitutional law, presumption of constitutionality, Singapore law
JEL Classification: K19
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lee, Jack Tsen-Ta, Rethinking the Presumption of Constitutionality (July 1, 2016). Jaclyn L Neo (ed), Constitutional Interpretation in Singapore: Theory and Practice (Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge) (ISBN 978-1-138-91448-3), Chapter 6, pp. 139-158, 2016; Singapore Management University School of Law Research Paper No. 16/2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2818465