Evaluating the Quality and Use of Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Mercatus Center's Regulatory Report Card, 2008-2013

Mercatus, 2016

111 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2016

See all articles by Jerry Ellig

Jerry Ellig

George Washington University - Regulatory Studies Center (deceased)

Date Written: July 7, 2016

Abstract

The Mercatus Center at George Mason University initiated its Regulatory Report Card project in 2009 to assess how well executive branch regulatory agencies conduct and use regulatory impact analysis and to identify ways to motivate improvement. Report Card evaluations reveal that agencies often adopt regulations that affect several hundred million Americans and impose hundreds of millions of dollars in costs without knowing whether a given regulation will really solve a significant problem, whether a more effective alternative solution exists, or whether a more targeted solution could achieve the same result at lower cost. Extensive statistical analysis of Report Card scores suggests that institutional reforms are the most promising means of improving the quality and use of regulatory impact analysis.

Keywords: administrative procedure, Administrative Procedure Act, regulation, regulatory reform,regulatory process, benefit-cost analysis, cost-benefit, regulatory impact analysis, regulatory review

JEL Classification: D61, D73, D78, H11, H83, K23, L51, P16

Suggested Citation

Ellig, Jerry, Evaluating the Quality and Use of Regulatory Impact Analysis: The Mercatus Center's Regulatory Report Card, 2008-2013 (July 7, 2016). Mercatus, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821088 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2821088

Jerry Ellig (Contact Author)

George Washington University - Regulatory Studies Center (deceased) ( email )

805 21st St. NW
Washington, DC 20052
United States
703-375-9410 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
87
Abstract Views
794
Rank
521,884
PlumX Metrics