Managing Open Innovation Projects with Impact

Whitepaper Series, 2016

69 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2017

See all articles by Sabine Brunswicker

Sabine Brunswicker

Purdue University - Research Center for Open Digital Innovation (RCODI); Purdue University - Discovery Park

Mehdi Bagherzadeh

NEOMA Business School

Allison Lamb

Purdue University - Research Center for Open Digital Innovation (RCODI)

Raghav Narsalay

Independent

Yu Jing

Independent

Date Written: July 2016

Abstract

In our recent open innovation executive studies, we learned that open innovation is of strategic value for large firms and an important topic for C-level executives (Chesbrough and Brunswicker 2014, Bagherzadeh and Brunswicker 2015). Large firms increasingly invest in open innovation, and there is evidence that such investment may pay off and increase a company’s productivity. Open innovation comes in many forms (or modes): Bilateral partnerships, IP licensing contracts, innovation contests, communities, and so forth. We learn that firms increasingly experiment with more novel approaches that involve a larger variety of external actors and support collaboration and information exchange across various boundaries. However, engaging in open innovation is accompanied with uncertainty and ambiguity. Open innovation is not a one-way-street with strictly transactional relationships; it requires firms to share information and knowledge with external partners, often with the help of digital technologies. The degree and the mode of information exchange and knowledge sharing tend to vary in open innovation projects, and reduce a firm’s ability to maintain control over sensitive information and value-creation. This further complicates the situation for senior executives when trying to answer questions such as, “How can we manage the uncertainty and ambiguity of open innovation when solving strategic innovation problems? How does the particular choice of one of the open innovation modes – partnership, community, contest – affect our choice of coordinating the interaction with external open innovation actors to align the innovation activities with the firm’s strategic goals?” This study seeks to answer such questions. To do so, our study team took a deep dive into multiple unique open innovation projects to provide a richer understanding of successful management practices.

Keywords: Open Innovation, Innovation Management, Project Governance, Contest, Community, Market, Partnership

Suggested Citation

Brunswicker, Sabine and Bagherzadeh, Mehdi and Lamb, Allison and Narsalay, Raghav and Jing, Yu, Managing Open Innovation Projects with Impact (July 2016). Whitepaper Series, 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821203 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2821203

Sabine Brunswicker (Contact Author)

Purdue University - Research Center for Open Digital Innovation (RCODI) ( email )

516 Northwestern Ave
West-Lafayette, IN 47906
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.purdue.edu/opendigital

Purdue University - Discovery Park ( email )

United States

Mehdi Bagherzadeh

NEOMA Business School ( email )

1 Rue du Maréchal Juin
Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, 76825
France
769254540 (Phone)

Allison Lamb

Purdue University - Research Center for Open Digital Innovation (RCODI) ( email )

207 S Martin Jischke Dr.
West Lafayette, IN 47906
United States

Raghav Narsalay

Independent

No Address Available

Yu Jing

Independent

No Address Available

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
253
rank
113,543
Abstract Views
1,101
PlumX Metrics