Lawyer Speech in the Regulatory State

23 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2016 Last revised: 26 Oct 2016

Date Written: August 11, 2016

Abstract

The unusual role lawyer speech plays, both as the embodiment of law and as the fulfillment of professional obligations, sets it apart from that of other government employees. This article critiques two highly controversial split decisions from the United States Supreme Court ascribing minimal First Amendment protection to government lawyer speech — Connick v. Meyer and Garcetti v. Ceballos — and proposes a framework to be applied to the workplace assessment speech of government lawyers when acting as a check on the power of the regulatory state, so long as the speech does not run counter to professional ethics obligations.

Suggested Citation

Newman Knake, Renee, Lawyer Speech in the Regulatory State (August 11, 2016). Fordham Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 5, 2016; U of Houston Law Center No. 2016-A-13. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2821801 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2821801

Renee Newman Knake (Contact Author)

University of Houston Law Center ( email )

Houston, TX 77003
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.uh.edu/faculty/main.asp?PID=5141

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
52
Abstract Views
502
rank
376,535
PlumX Metrics