Delimiting Fiduciary Status

Forthcoming, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON FIDUCIARY LAW (D. Gordon Smith & Andrew S. Gold, eds.) (Elgar Publishing)

20 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2016

Date Written: June 29, 2016

Abstract

A familiar problem to scholars of fiduciary law is that of definition. Fiduciary law has been called “messy,” “elusive,” and “unusually vexing.” In part, this is because fiduciary law principles appear in many areas of law, but are applied differently in each. This has made the development of a unified theory difficult. Some scholars have doubted whether it is even possible; others have insisted that it is not possible. Nevertheless, scholars continue to try to bring order to the perceived chaos. My goal in this short paper will be to sketch out the contours of a reasonably coherent theory that covers enough phenomena to have a plausible claim to descriptive accuracy while also providing objective criteria for the exclusion of marginal cases. While a simple definition would be nice, some complexity may be necessary in order to achieve this goal.

Keywords: Fiduciary law, fiduciary relationships, fiduciary duties, duty of loyalty

JEL Classification: K10, K36

Suggested Citation

Velasco, Julian, Delimiting Fiduciary Status (June 29, 2016). Forthcoming, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON FIDUCIARY LAW (D. Gordon Smith & Andrew S. Gold, eds.) (Elgar Publishing), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2823774

Julian Velasco (Contact Author)

Notre Dame Law School ( email )

2142 Eck Hall of Law
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0780
United States
574-631-4965 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.nd.edu/directory/julian-velasco/

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
121
Abstract Views
728
Rank
415,206
PlumX Metrics