Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Some Issues on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and Its Relationship with the Brussels I Recast Especially Anti-Suit Injunctions, Concurrent Proceedings and the Implications of Brexit

(2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 386

(2016) 2 Centre for Private International Law Aberdeen Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 2016/5

24 Pages Posted: 19 Sep 2016 Last revised: 27 Aug 2017

Mukarrum Ahmed

Lancaster University

Paul R. Beaumont

University of Aberdeen

Date Written: August 11, 2016

Abstract

This research paper argues that the Hague Convention’s system of ‘qualified’ or ‘partial’ mutual trust may permit anti-suit injunctions, actions for damages for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements and anti-enforcement injunctions where such remedies further the objective of the Convention. However, intra-EU Hague Convention cases may arguably not permit remedies for breach of exclusive jurisdiction agreements as they may be deemed to be an infringement of the principle of mutual trust and the principle of effectiveness of EU law (effetutile) which animate the multilateral jurisdiction and judgments order of the Brussels I Recast Regulation. The dynamics of the relationship between Article 31(2) of the Recast Regulation and Articles 5 and 6 of the Hague Convention will also be mapped in this paper. It will be argued that the Hartley-Dogauchi Report’s interpretative approach has much to commend it as it follows the path of least resistance by narrowly construing the right to sue in a non-chosen forum as an exception rather than the norm. This exceptional nature of the right to sue in the non-chosen forum under the Hague Convention can be effectively reconciled with the Brussels I Recast Regulation's reverse lis pendens rule under Article 31(2). This will usually result in the stay of the proceedings in the non-chosen court as soon as the chosen court is seised. The likely outcome post-BREXIT is that the regime applicable between the UK and the EU (apart from Denmark) in relation to exclusive jurisdiction agreements within the scope of the Hague Convention will be the Hague Convention.

Keywords: private international law, conflict of laws, international commercial litigation, Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements, Brussels I Recast Regulation, exclusive jurisdiction agreements, anti-suit injunctions, parallel proceedings, lis pendens, BREXIT

Suggested Citation

Ahmed, Mukarrum and Beaumont, Paul R., Exclusive Choice of Court Agreements: Some Issues on the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements and Its Relationship with the Brussels I Recast Especially Anti-Suit Injunctions, Concurrent Proceedings and the Implications of Brexit (August 11, 2016). (2017) 13 Journal of Private International Law 386; (2016) 2 Centre for Private International Law Aberdeen Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 2016/5. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2824703

Mukarrum Ahmed (Contact Author)

Lancaster University ( email )

Law School
Lancaster, England LA1 4YN
United Kingdom

Paul R. Beaumont

University of Aberdeen ( email )

Dunbar Street
Aberdeen AB24 3QY, Scotland AB24 3QY
United Kingdom

Paper statistics

Downloads
296
Rank
84,904
Abstract Views
720