23 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance (2017)
59 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2016 Last revised: 18 Apr 2017
Date Written: August 17, 2016
There are many decisions that Americans have to make about retirement before, at, and after retirement. For example, Americans have to decide when to start saving for retirement, how much to save, how to invest those savings, when to retire, when to claim social security, and how to take required minimum distributions from 401(k) plans or Individual Retirement Accounts. Different things can go wrong at each of these decisions for different reasons. Many Americans, for various reasons, including insufficient energy, money, motivation, time, and understanding, do no retirement planning. Some Americans do some retirement planning, yet worry they are doing insufficient or ineffective retirement planning. A few knowledgeable or wealthy Americans do, or have done for them, sufficient and effective retirement planning. Insufficient or ineffective retirement planning causes Americans to experience decreased financial wealth, health, objective living standards, and subjective well-being in addition to suffer increased anxiety, depression, stress, and worry. Our American economy also has to deal with the resulting negative externalities of many Americans retiring into poverty. This Article analyzes how Americans can achieve retirement prosperity by changing their thinking about retirement. This Article advocates the American federal government educate Americans in thinking about retirement to utilize more thinking tools, think more mindfully, and think more societally. This Article’s proposals are based on and introduce to retirement planning the field of cognitive economics.
Keywords: Retirement, Thinking Tools, Thinking Architecture, Thinking Technology, Cognitive Economics
JEL Classification: A12, D03, D14, D91, G02, G11, G18, H55, J14, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Huang, Peter H., Achieving American Retirement Prosperity by Changing Americans' Thinking About Retirement (August 17, 2016). 23 Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance (2017). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2824917 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2824917