Sample Selection Bias, Return Moments, and the Performance of Optimal versus Naive Diversification

53 Pages Posted: 18 Aug 2016 Last revised: 10 Nov 2016

See all articles by Bowei Li

Bowei Li

University of Melbourne, Department of Finance, Students

Date Written: September 18, 2016

Abstract

I examine the sample selection bias in portfolio horse race. Numerous studies propose mean-variance portfolio rules to outperform the naive 1/N portfolio rule. However, the outperformance is often justified by a small number of pre-selected datasets. Using a new performance test based on a large number of datasets, I compare thirteen "1/N outperformers" with the naive rule. Results show that not only a majority of the thirteen "1/N outperformers" on average underperform the 1/N rule significantly, but also none of these mean-variance rules significantly outperform the naive benchmark in more than 10% of the datasets. To further understand portfolio performance, this paper explores the theoretical relations between assets' return moments and the performance of optimal versus naive diversification. These relations not only imply strong performance predictability, but also can be exploited to deliver out-of-sample portfolio benefits.

Keywords: sample selection bias, mean-variance portfolio, performance test, predictability

JEL Classification: G11, G12

Suggested Citation

Li, Bowei, Sample Selection Bias, Return Moments, and the Performance of Optimal versus Naive Diversification (September 18, 2016). 29th Australasian Finance and Banking Conference 2016. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2825885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2825885

Bowei Li (Contact Author)

University of Melbourne, Department of Finance, Students ( email )

Melbourne
Australia

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
291
rank
379,790
PlumX Metrics