Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Estimation Methods Matter

Economic Inquiry, vol. 57(3), July 2019, 1272-1283.

McMaster University, Department of Economics, Working Paper Series, 2016-08

24 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2016 Last revised: 16 Jun 2023

See all articles by John Kealey

John Kealey

McMaster University

Pau Pujolas

McMaster University

César Sosa-Padilla

McMaster University - Faculty of Social Sciences

Date Written: June 11, 2018

Abstract

In this paper we show that the relationship between trade liberalization and fi rm productivity is sensitive to the method used to estimate the production function. We estimate the productivity of Colombian manufacturing plants using the methods of Levinsohn and Petrin (2003), Ackerberg, Caves and Frazer (2015), and Gandhi, Navarro and Rivers (2017) and at times come to surprisingly different conclusions about firm productivity growth after the liberalization. Results from a growth decomposition exercise and from a quantile regression model reinforce the dissimilarity of results across methods.

Keywords: Trade Liberalization, Firm Productivity Distribution, Production Function Estimation, Nonparametric Estimation

JEL Classification: F13, F14, D24, C14

Suggested Citation

Kealey, John and Pujolas, Pau and Sosa-Padilla, César, Trade Liberalization and Firm Productivity: Estimation Methods Matter (June 11, 2018). Economic Inquiry, vol. 57(3), July 2019, 1272-1283., McMaster University, Department of Economics, Working Paper Series, 2016-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2826761 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2826761

John Kealey

McMaster University ( email )

1280 Main Street West
Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4
Canada

Pau Pujolas (Contact Author)

McMaster University ( email )

1280 Main Street West
Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4M4
Canada

César Sosa-Padilla

McMaster University - Faculty of Social Sciences ( email )

Canada

HOME PAGE: http://sites.google.com/site/cesarsosapadilla/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
633
Rank
789,195
PlumX Metrics