Brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of Intellectual Property Professors in Support of Respondent Apple Inc. in Samsung v. Apple (U.S. 2016, No. 15-777)
41 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2016
Date Written: August 19, 2016
Abstract
This brief explores the historical foundations of design patent law's special remedies provision. We draw on its legislative history and British antecedent to contextualize the debate between Apple and Samsung over the appropriate method of calculating design patent damages under Section 289 of the Patent Act.
Keywords: design patents, design, remedies, 289, Apple, Samsung, total profits, profits, apportionment, design, design law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Janis, Mark David and Du Mont, Jason J., Brief of Amici Curiae on Behalf of Intellectual Property Professors in Support of Respondent Apple Inc. in Samsung v. Apple (U.S. 2016, No. 15-777) (August 19, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2826805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2826805
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.