I Am Not Your (Founding) Father

in Richard Albert, Nishchal Basnyat, and Menaka Guruswamy (eds), Founding Moments in Constitutional Creation and Reconstruction (Hart Publishing 2019, Forthcoming)

33 Pages Posted: 30 Aug 2016 Last revised: 25 Nov 2018

See all articles by Mikolaj Barczentewicz

Mikolaj Barczentewicz

University of Oxford - University College

Date Written: November 12, 2017

Abstract

Lawyers across the globe routinely talk about what the ‘founding fathers’ or the ‘framers’ of their constitution (or a founding treaty) meant, expected, intended and so on. The point of this paper is that some of the founding fathers talk in legal contexts is confused, because it refers to people who did not make the constitution. I help to dispel the confusion through analysis of what does it mean to be an agent behind making a constitution as law – what does it mean to be a constitution-maker.

This paper presents a general theory of legally authoritative agency in constitution-making, with a particular emphasis on group action. With the analytical toolkit in hand I consider the cases of Australia, Canada and the United States. I identify who was the constitution-maker there and I look at some possible ways of justifying legal uses of historical materials, which are unconnected to the constitution-maker.

Keywords: constitution-making, founding moments, originalism, jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Barczentewicz, Mikolaj, I Am Not Your (Founding) Father (November 12, 2017). in Richard Albert, Nishchal Basnyat, and Menaka Guruswamy (eds), Founding Moments in Constitutional Creation and Reconstruction (Hart Publishing 2019, Forthcoming). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831472

Mikolaj Barczentewicz (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - University College ( email )

High Street
Oxford, OX1 4BH
United Kingdom

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
136
PlumX Metrics